Home > Biography, Luke Prater, Poetry > duplicity in thirty-four syllables

duplicity in thirty-four syllables

February 21st, 2012 Leave a comment Go to comments

 

 
 

duplicity, cheap
as chips; integrity, free -
given space to stir

 

seething spirals rank
ink misunderstandings arc
beneath cybersink

 
 

11 people like this post.

  1. Gordon Hilgers
    February 21st, 2012 at 23:23 | #1

    Communism! Pure and utter Communism! hehe!

       1 likes

  2. February 21st, 2012 at 23:40 | #2

    For me, hits very close to home. Makes me wonder what to trust. Great write.

       1 likes

  3. February 21st, 2012 at 23:40 | #3

    @Gordon Hilgers Thank ya Gordon. Yup pinko commie me

       0 likes

  4. February 21st, 2012 at 23:44 | #4

    @Beth Thanks Beth

       0 likes

  5. February 21st, 2012 at 23:45 | #5

    i could do it in one word…but she would not like to see her name…just saying…ha…nice bend or the words luke…

       2 likes

  6. February 21st, 2012 at 23:53 | #6

    @brian I could’ve done it in one word too… it might have been a bit harsh to put her name up on my blog like that, as you say… thanks brother

       1 likes

  7. February 22nd, 2012 at 02:01 | #7

    well, there certainly isn’t any shortage of people playing nefarious games via social networking sites. I continue to be completely disheartened by the juvenile mindsets of many. Sorry that you got caught up in this hurtful situation. There is NO substitute for genuine intentions. Time will heal this…and the loss is ALL hers.

    I do think there is a lot of power in the brevity of your words, unique to see such a short piece from you. some great alliteration in L4 and I much prefer the revision of ‘chips’ to ‘chaps’ in L2.

    much love and affection– xC.

       1 likes

  8. February 22nd, 2012 at 02:59 | #8

    hi…my name is Frank …errr…I mean Nancy…I’m new here and I really like this poetry stuff

    short jabs here
    a left
    a right

    knocked out

    Peace Brother Luke

       1 likes

  9. February 22nd, 2012 at 03:00 | #9

    Well, you know this one resonates with me Luke.. the distillation into 34 slicing syllables makes for a sharper kick. The recoil is palpable.

    Not so sure about the edit to chaps.. but fully admit ‘cheap as chips’ may be a personal preference.. it has such a cack dismissal attached.

    Who says you don’t do short?

       1 likes

  10. February 22nd, 2012 at 04:26 | #10

    Very well said…precise and to the point.
    Peace,
    Siggi in Downeast Maine

       1 likes

  11. Dragon Ka-Tet
    February 22nd, 2012 at 05:30 | #11

    :( A ghost in the machine? She’s not worth it then. I like the extra space between

    “given space to stir” and “seething spirals rank”. Short, to the point (very sharp point) and an apt image to go with it. Well done.

       1 likes

  12. February 22nd, 2012 at 15:21 | #12

    Thanks all… ‘chips’ I removed in favour of ‘chaps’ as ‘cheap as chips’ is a very common saying in the UK. ‘chaps’ offers at least two meanings

       0 likes

  13. Fred
    February 22nd, 2012 at 19:40 | #13

    All that in 34 syllables, wow. I probably would’ve spent a good page and a half saying the same thing-lol Each word packs a punch, love it. tough, tight and strong. Thanks

       1 likes

  14. February 22nd, 2012 at 20:42 | #14

    @Fred Cheers Fred, thank you for visiting

       0 likes

  15. February 23rd, 2012 at 03:31 | #15

    mm.. ‘chaps’ may have the meanings you want.. but reduces the edge for me… especially aurally. ‘cheap as chips’ has such a sense of disposability.. and a greater spit with the ‘i’ rather than the ‘a’ (just saying… :)

       1 likes

  16. February 23rd, 2012 at 14:36 | #16

    @becky kilsby But what a cliché??

       0 likes

  17. February 23rd, 2012 at 16:41 | #17

    Yeah..definitely.. but isn’t that your point? Aren’t you saying duplicity is ubiquitous.. almost as common as a cliche or as easy to come by?

       1 likes

  18. February 23rd, 2012 at 17:42 | #18

    @becky kilsby I suppose so… tho’ ‘chaps’ has at least three meanings if not four, all up

       0 likes

  19. February 23rd, 2012 at 22:46 | #19

    @becky kilsby ‘chips’ it is…

       0 likes

  20. February 24th, 2012 at 01:10 | #20

    Luke,
    I had to come visit. Your comments left my head spinning. I’ve read it about three times now, and I’m still learning something. For the answer to your questions, pop back over if you didn’t subscribe to follow-ups. (I think I have that option turned on. I hope so. I will if I don’t.)

    As to these gems above, I like them. They also required more than one read. I keep spinning slightly different meanings in my head as I alter the possible meanings of certain words (like “rank”). I enjoy writing like that. Thank you for your visit, your erudite comments, and the lure back here which allowed me to read and enjoy.

       2 likes

  21. February 24th, 2012 at 13:46 | #21

    @Yousei Hime Hi Yousei – I was a little embarrassed actually that just when I had stumbled on decent haiku that had clearly been written with the tradition is mind and the great art of it all there, I, for the first time ever, had just posted two senryū. I never do… I never write haiku/senryū because I just don’t feel qualified. They are NOT just 17 syllables in 5-7-5 arrangement. In fact as I said the syllables are far less important to the other aspects. What I did here is a Westerner’s idea of senryū, and yes, I used plenty of Western poetic device too. I think I have the cut OK, but more or less that’s it. The reason for me posting these is that the statement I am making is directed at someone who writes “haiku” constantly. Is it a serious attempt? Yes and no. Basho said to learn the rules and break them, but I know he meant within reason. Thanks for the comments and I’ll come over and read your reply to mine. Thanks again Yousei

       0 likes

  22. February 24th, 2012 at 13:59 | #22

    @Luke Prater
    I think writing in response to something or someone is fine, as long as one is still trying to create something unique in the response. A search on my blog will turn up 5-7-5 haiku/senryu, often without the more important elements. Writing in a single line is newer for me, and I actually took some time to think about changing to it. Ultimately I look for what is communicated more than the technical aspects of form. It might have everything on the haiku checklist and be terrible (I know I’ve written too many of those).

    I read somewhere, in my way-too-many haiku books, that a poet writes five good haiku in his lifetime, and a master, ten (or something close to that). Obviously the exact quote escapes me but I absorbed the message–keep failing until you uncover one. Then write until you find the next one.

    Goodness, I’ll step down off that silly box now. Alright … all that blah-blah, and I missed what I wanted to say the most. Your poem(s) above (I like them as one, btw) aren’t conventional senryu. However, they are powerful and thought-provoking. Anything that makes one think has merit, and maybe more. Thank you for making me think.

       1 likes

  23. February 24th, 2012 at 15:06 | #23

    @Yousei Hime Indeed they are not conventional (in teh Japanese sense)/traditional senryū. They are what 95% of Westerners think pass as something like haiku or senryū but we’re not quite sure but who cares look we have 17 syllables and some of the words are nice. This, again, is why I don’t write in these forms… until I master them. I will not (bar occasionally, though I doubt I’ll ever blog one again :)

    Thanks Yousei… stimulating topic

       0 likes

  24. February 24th, 2012 at 18:09 | #24

    I think chips is a good choice, Luke. Breakdowns in relationships are never easy, online relationships seem to be even more tenuous due to the nature of them, and the inability to really articulate what we mean at times. Great poetry here, sir.

       1 likes

  25. March 9th, 2012 at 14:10 | #25

    @Emma Thank you Em

       0 likes

  26. March 26th, 2012 at 08:58 | #26

    That’s really good!

       1 likes

  27. March 27th, 2012 at 12:46 | #27

    @Madeleine Begun Kane Glad you think so!

       0 likes

  1. No trackbacks yet.